Skip to content

ReportsAAPL10-Q FY2026

SEC filings, compared

What changed in Apple's 10-Q for the quarter ended June 27, 2026

Compared with the 10-Q for the quarter ended June 28, 2025. Part I, Item 2 and Part II, Item 1A analysed; every summary checked against the quoted filing text.

Registrant
Apple Inc. · AAPL
This filing
0000320193-26-000020 · filed Jul 31, 2026
Compared with
0000320193-25-000073 · filed Aug 1, 2025
Processed
Sep 18, 2026 UTC · parser-v4 · classify-v4 · select-v1

Research tool. Describes what filings say. Not investment advice. Verify independently. Read the cited paragraph before relying on it.

How a report is made

28 material changes among 52 changed paragraphs

10 shown by default across the three sections below; each section's "Show all" reaches the rest, in filing order.

What the company says for the first time

Paragraphs with no counterpart in the prior filing.

3 material additions

Part I, Item 2 · MD&A

3 of 3 shown · In filing order, too few to rank

01AddedPart I, Item 2 › Macroeconomic Conditions

Summary · quote-checked

Added disclosure of component supply constraints, rising costs, expected intensification, and risks from mitigation actions such as price increases.

The new paragraph introduces substantive supply, cost, margin, demand, revenue, and financial-condition risks, including potentially ineffective or harmful price increases.

Filing text · FY2025 10-Q · filed Aug 1, 2025

No corresponding language in the FY2025 10-Q.

Filing text · FY2026 10-Q · filed Jul 31, 2026

[added] The Company is experiencing a period of supply constraints and increasing costs for components driven by factors such as industry supply-demand imbalances for components, including advanced semiconductors, storage (NAND) and memory (DRAM). The Company expects these trends to intensify, which may materially negatively impact the Company's revenue, costs, gross margin, results of operations and financial condition. Actions, such as price increases, that have been and may in the future be taken by the Company may not effectively mitigate these negative impacts, and may also reduce demand for the Company's products and materially adversely affect the Company's revenue, costs, gross margin, results of operations and financial condition.

Cite this change

"The Company is experiencing a period of supply constraints and increasing costs for components driven by factors such as industry supply-demand imbalances for components, including advanced semiconductors, storage (NAND) and memory (DRAM)."

Apple, Form 10-Q for FY2026, Part I, Item 2, accession 0000320193-26-000020, filed 31 July 2026.

Filing: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/320193/000032019326000020/aapl-20260627.htm

Comparison: https://yearover.com/reports/aapl/0000320193-26-000020?ref=quote

Summaries are written by a model and checked against the quoted text. The quotes are the record.

02AddedPart I, Item 2 › Liquidity and Capital Resources

Summary · quote-checked

Adds disclosure of purchase obligations related to suppliers, intellectual property, content, distribution rights, and capital assets.

The new paragraph discloses previously unstated obligations and amounts payable, changing the filing’s description of commitments and liquidity-related exposures.

Filing text · FY2025 10-Q · filed Aug 1, 2025

No corresponding language in the FY2025 10-Q.

Filing text · FY2026 10-Q · filed Jul 31, 2026

[added] The Company's other purchase obligations primarily consist of noncancelable obligations related to supplier arrangements, licensed intellectual property and content, distribution rights, and the acquisition of capital assets related to product manufacturing. As of June 27, 2026, the Company had other purchase obligations of $29.3 billion, with $9.2 billion payable within 12 months.

Cite this change

"The Company's other purchase obligations primarily consist of noncancelable obligations related to supplier arrangements, licensed intellectual property and content, distribution rights, and the acquisition of capital assets related to product manufacturing. As of June 27, 2026, the Company had other purchase obligations of $29.3 billion, with $9.2 billion payable within 12 months."

Apple, Form 10-Q for FY2026, Part I, Item 2, accession 0000320193-26-000020, filed 31 July 2026.

Filing: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/320193/000032019326000020/aapl-20260627.htm

Comparison: https://yearover.com/reports/aapl/0000320193-26-000020?ref=quote

Summaries are written by a model and checked against the quoted text. The quotes are the record.

03AddedPart I, Item 2 › Liquidity and Capital Resources

Summary · quote-checked

Added disclosure that the Company paid the remaining $8.8 billion deemed repatriation tax balance during the first nine months of 2026.

The new paragraph discloses a specific tax obligation and its payment, adding substantive information about the Company’s cash uses and obligations.

Filing text · FY2025 10-Q · filed Aug 1, 2025

No corresponding language in the FY2025 10-Q.

Filing text · FY2026 10-Q · filed Jul 31, 2026

[added] During the first nine months of 2026, the Company paid the remaining $8.8 billion balance of the deemed repatriation tax payable imposed by the U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017.

Cite this change

"During the first nine months of 2026, the Company paid the remaining $8.8 billion balance of the deemed repatriation tax payable imposed by the U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017."

Apple, Form 10-Q for FY2026, Part I, Item 2, accession 0000320193-26-000020, filed 31 July 2026.

Filing: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/320193/000032019326000020/aapl-20260627.htm

Comparison: https://yearover.com/reports/aapl/0000320193-26-000020?ref=quote

Summaries are written by a model and checked against the quoted text. The quotes are the record.

What the company no longer says

Paragraphs of the prior filing that this filing dropped. Only last year's text can show these.

2 material removals

Part I, Item 2 · MD&A

2 of 2 shown · In filing order, too few to rank

01RemovedPart I, Item 2 › Gross Margin

Summary · quote-checked

The filing removed a paragraph explaining products gross margin decreases and their primary drivers during 2025.

The removed MD&A paragraph stated changed results and attributed them to tariffs, product mix, and favorable costs; its disappearance removes substantive performance explanation.

Filing text · FY2025 10-Q · filed Aug 1, 2025

[removed] Products gross margin percentage decreased during the third quarter of 2025 compared to the third quarter of 2024 due primarily to tariffs and a different mix of products, partially offset by favorable costs. Products gross margin percentage decreased during the first nine months of 2025 compared to the same period in 2024 due primarily to a different mix of products and tariffs, partially offset by favorable costs.

Filing text · FY2026 10-Q · filed Jul 31, 2026

No corresponding language in the FY2026 10-Q.

Cite this change

"Products gross margin percentage decreased during the third quarter of 2025 compared to the third quarter of 2024 due primarily to tariffs and a different mix of products, partially offset by favorable costs. Products gross margin percentage decreased during the first nine months of 2025 compared to the same period in 2024 due primarily to a different mix of products and tariffs, partially offset by favorable costs."

Apple, Form 10-Q for FY2025, Part I, Item 2, accession 0000320193-25-000073, filed 1 August 2025.

Filing: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/320193/000032019325000073/aapl-20250628.htm

Comparison: https://yearover.com/reports/aapl/0000320193-26-000020?ref=quote

Summaries are written by a model and checked against the quoted text. The quotes are the record.

02RemovedPart I, Item 2 › Liquidity and Capital Resources

Summary · quote-checked

Removed disclosure that €14.2 billion, or $15.4 billion, was released from escrow to fully settle the State Aid Decision obligation.

The removed paragraph disclosed a specific legal obligation and its settlement, changing what the filing says about obligations and cash deployment.

Filing text · FY2025 10-Q · filed Aug 1, 2025

[removed] During the first nine months of 2025, the Company released from escrow €14.2 billion, or $15.4 billion, to Ireland in connection with the State Aid Decision, which fully settled the obligation.

Filing text · FY2026 10-Q · filed Jul 31, 2026

No corresponding language in the FY2026 10-Q.

Cite this change

"During the first nine months of 2025, the Company released from escrow €14.2 billion, or $15.4 billion, to Ireland in connection with the State Aid Decision, which fully settled the obligation."

Apple, Form 10-Q for FY2025, Part I, Item 2, accession 0000320193-25-000073, filed 1 August 2025.

Filing: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/320193/000032019325000073/aapl-20250628.htm

Comparison: https://yearover.com/reports/aapl/0000320193-26-000020?ref=quote

Summaries are written by a model and checked against the quoted text. The quotes are the record.

What the company says differently

Paragraphs that changed between the two filings, shown as a word diff.

23 material changes

Part I, Item 2 · MD&A

5 of 23 shown · Ordered by the model, quote-checked

01Figures updatedPart I, Item 2 › Liquidity and Capital Resources

Summary · quote-checked

Manufacturing purchase obligations increased from $44.1 billion to $57.0 billion, while amounts payable within 12 months increased from $43.8 billion to $56.2 billion.

The updated figures materially change the stated level of manufacturing commitments and near-term payment obligations, giving readers a different view of exposure and liquidity requirements.

Why the model ranked it here

The substantially higher manufacturing commitments and near-term payment obligations give clients a materially different view of liquidity requirements.

Filing text · FY2025 10-Q · filed Aug 1, 2025

The Company utilizes several outsourcing partners to manufacture subassemblies for the Company's products and to perform final assembly and testing of finished products. The Company also obtains individual components for its products from a wide variety of individual suppliers. As of June [removed] 28, 2025, the Company had manufacturing purchase obligations of [removed] $44.1 billion, with [removed] $43.8 billion payable within 12 months.

Filing text · FY2026 10-Q · filed Jul 31, 2026

The Company utilizes several outsourcing partners to manufacture subassemblies for the Company's products and to perform final assembly and testing of finished products. The Company also obtains individual components for its products from a wide variety of individual suppliers. As of June [added] 27, 2026, the Company had manufacturing purchase obligations of [added] $57.0 billion, with [added] $56.2 billion payable within 12 months.

Cite this change

"As of June 27, 2026, the Company had manufacturing purchase obligations of $57.0 billion, with $56.2 billion payable within 12 months."

Apple, Form 10-Q for FY2026, Part I, Item 2, accession 0000320193-26-000020, filed 31 July 2026.

Filing: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/320193/000032019326000020/aapl-20260627.htm

Comparison: https://yearover.com/reports/aapl/0000320193-26-000020?ref=quote

Summaries are written by a model and checked against the quoted text. The quotes are the record.

02ChangedPart I, Item 2 › Tariffs and Other Measures

Summary · quote-checked

The tariff discussion replaces a general adverse-impact warning with reported investigation results, a Supreme Court ruling, tariff refunds, and new Section 301 measures.

The disclosure adds specific legal and regulatory events, a refund claim and accounting treatment, while removing the prior broad uncertainty and business-impact discussion.

Why the model ranked it here

The tariff disclosure now describes specific legal and regulatory developments, refunds, and new measures that change the company’s stated exposure and accounting treatment.

Filing text · FY2025 10-Q · filed Aug 1, 2025

Beginning in the second quarter of 2025, new tariffs were announced on imports to the [removed] U.S. ("U.S. Tariffs"), including additional tariffs on imports from China, India, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Vietnam and the European Union ("EU"), among others. In response, several countries have imposed, or threatened to impose, reciprocal tariffs on imports from the U.S. and other retaliatory measures. [removed] Various modifications to the U.S. Tariffs have been announced and further changes could be made in the future, which may include additional sector-based tariffs or other measures. For example, the U.S. Department of Commerce [removed] has initiated an investigation under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, as amended, [removed] into, among other things, imports of semiconductors, semiconductor manufacturing equipment, and their derivative products, including downstream products that contain semiconductors. [removed] Tariffs and other measures that are applied to the Company's [removed] products or their components can have a material adverse impact on the Company's business, results of operations and financial condition, including impacting the Company's supply chain, the availability of rare earths and other raw materials and components, pricing and gross margin. The ultimate impact remains uncertain and will depend on several factors, including whether additional or incremental U.S. Tariffs or other measures are announced or imposed, to what extent other countries implement tariffs or other retaliatory measures in response, and the overall magnitude and duration of these measures. Trade and other international disputes can have an adverse impact on the overall macroeconomic environment and result in shifts and reductions in consumer spending and negative consumer sentiment for the Company's products and services, all of which can further adversely affect the Company's business and results of operations.

Filing text · FY2026 10-Q · filed Jul 31, 2026

Beginning in the second quarter of 2025, new tariffs were announced on imports to the [added] U.S., including additional tariffs on imports from China, India, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Vietnam and the European Union ("EU"), among others. In response, several countries have imposed, or threatened to impose, reciprocal tariffs on imports from the U.S. and other retaliatory measures. [added] On January 14, 2026, initial results were published of the previously announced U.S. Department of Commerce investigation under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, as amended, [added] into imports of semiconductors, semiconductor manufacturing equipment, and their derivative products, including downstream products that contain semiconductors. [added] The announcement of the initial results of the investigation did not impose any additional tariffs affecting the Company's [added] products. Separately, on February 20, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court ("Supreme Court") issued a ruling striking down certain tariffs previously imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977. The Company has applied for a refund of tariffs paid, following the processes established by U.S. Customs and Border Protection, and has recognized any refunds received as a reduction of products cost of sales. Various modifications to U.S. tariffs have been announced, including the recent imposition of tariffs under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974, and further changes could be made in the future, which may include additional measures under the Section 232 semiconductor sector investigation, additional sector-based tariffs, further actions under Section 301, or other measures. Tariffs and other measures that are applied to the Company's products or their components can have a material adverse impact on the Company's business, results of operations and financial condition, including impacting the Company's supply chain, the availability of rare earths and other raw materials and components, pricing and gross margin. The ultimate impact remains uncertain and will depend on several factors, including whether additional or incremental U.S. tariffs or other measures are announced or imposed, to what extent other countries implement tariffs or other retaliatory measures in response, and the overall magnitude and duration of these measures. Trade and other international disputes can have an adverse impact on the overall macroeconomic environment and result in shifts and reductions in consumer spending and negative consumer sentiment for the Company's products and services, all of which can further adversely affect the Company's business and results of operations.

Cite this change

"Separately, on February 20, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court ("Supreme Court") issued a ruling striking down certain tariffs previously imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977."

Apple, Form 10-Q for FY2026, Part I, Item 2, accession 0000320193-26-000020, filed 31 July 2026.

Filing: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/320193/000032019326000020/aapl-20260627.htm

Comparison: https://yearover.com/reports/aapl/0000320193-26-000020?ref=quote

Summaries are written by a model and checked against the quoted text. The quotes are the record.

03ChangedPart I, Item 2 › Tariffs and Other Measures

Summary · quote-checked

Added disclosure that tariffs and other measures may affect the Company's business, supply chain, materials availability, pricing, gross margin and financial condition.

The added sentences introduce a specific tariff-related risk, affected dependencies and uncertainty about additional measures, materially expanding the disclosed exposure beyond general international disputes.

Why the model ranked it here

The newly identified tariff risk links potential measures directly to supply-chain access, materials availability, pricing, margins, and financial condition.

Filing text · FY2025 10-Q · filed Aug 1, 2025

Beginning in the second quarter of 2025, new tariffs were announced on imports to the U.S. ("U.S. Tariffs"), including additional tariffs on imports from China, India, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Vietnam and the European Union ("EU"), among others. In response, several countries have imposed, or threatened to impose, reciprocal tariffs on imports from the U.S. and other retaliatory measures. Various modifications to the U.S. Tariffs have been announced and further changes could be made in the future, which may include additional sector-based tariffs or other measures. For example, the U.S. Department of Commerce has initiated an investigation under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, as amended, into, among other things, imports of semiconductors, semiconductor manufacturing equipment, and their derivative products, including downstream products that contain semiconductors. Tariffs and other measures that are applied to the Company's products or their components can have a material adverse impact on the Company's business, results of operations and financial condition, including impacting the Company's supply chain, the availability of rare earths and other raw materials and components, pricing and gross margin. The ultimate impact remains uncertain and will depend on several factors, including whether additional or incremental U.S. Tariffs or other measures are announced or imposed, to what extent other countries implement tariffs or other retaliatory measures in response, and the overall magnitude and duration of these measures. Trade and other international disputes can have an adverse impact on the overall macroeconomic environment and result in shifts and reductions in consumer spending and negative consumer sentiment for the Company's products and services, all of which can further adversely affect the Company's business and results of operations.

Filing text · FY2026 10-Q · filed Jul 31, 2026

Beginning in the second quarter of 2025, new tariffs were announced on imports to the U.S., including additional tariffs on imports from China, India, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Vietnam and the European Union ("EU"), among others. In response, several countries have imposed, or threatened to impose, reciprocal tariffs on imports from the U.S. and other retaliatory measures. On January 14, 2026, initial results were published of the previously announced U.S. Department of Commerce investigation under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, as amended, into imports of semiconductors, semiconductor manufacturing equipment, and their derivative products, including downstream products that contain semiconductors. The announcement of the initial results of the investigation did not impose any additional tariffs affecting the Company's products. Separately, on February 20, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court ("Supreme Court") issued a ruling striking down certain tariffs previously imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977. The Company has applied for a refund of tariffs paid, following the processes established by U.S. Customs and Border Protection, and has recognized any refunds received as a reduction of products cost of sales. Various modifications to U.S. tariffs have been announced, including the recent imposition of tariffs under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974, and further changes could be made in the future, which may include additional measures under the Section 232 semiconductor sector investigation, additional sector-based tariffs, further actions under Section 301, or other measures. [added] Tariffs and other measures that are applied to the Company's products or their components can have a material adverse impact on the Company's business, results of operations and financial condition, including impacting the Company's supply chain, the availability of rare earths and other raw materials and components, pricing and gross margin. The ultimate impact remains uncertain and will depend on several factors, including whether additional or incremental U.S. tariffs or other measures are announced or imposed, to what extent other countries implement tariffs or other retaliatory measures in response, and the overall magnitude and duration of these measures. Trade and other international disputes can have an adverse impact on the overall macroeconomic environment and result in shifts and reductions in consumer spending and negative consumer sentiment for the Company's products and services, all of which can further adversely affect the Company's business and results of operations.

Cite this change

"Tariffs and other measures that are applied to the Company's products or their components can have a material adverse impact on the Company's business, results of operations and financial condition, including impacting the Company's supply chain, the availability of rare earths and other raw materials and components, pricing and gross margin."

Apple, Form 10-Q for FY2026, Part I, Item 2, accession 0000320193-26-000020, filed 31 July 2026.

Filing: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/320193/000032019326000020/aapl-20260627.htm

Comparison: https://yearover.com/reports/aapl/0000320193-26-000020?ref=quote

Summaries are written by a model and checked against the quoted text. The quotes are the record.

04ChangedPart I, Item 2 › Provision for Income Taxes

Summary · quote-checked

Effective tax rates shifted from lower to higher year-over-year, with different stated drivers including foreign earnings, Treasury regulations, and the State Aid Decision.

The outlook direction changed and the paragraph adds or replaces substantive tax-rate drivers, including a named regulatory development and foreign-currency-related tax impacts.

Why the model ranked it here

The effective tax rate shifted from a lower to a higher comparative result, with new regulatory and foreign-currency-related drivers that alter the tax narrative.

Filing text · FY2025 10-Q · filed Aug 1, 2025

The Company's effective tax rate for the third quarter of [removed] 2025 was higher compared to the third quarter of [removed] 2024 due primarily to the impact from foreign currency revaluations of unrecognized tax [removed] benefits. The Company's effective tax rate for the first nine months of [removed] 2025 was lower compared to the same period in [removed] 2024 due primarily to the impact of changes in unrecognized tax benefits, [removed] partially offset by a higher effective tax rate on foreign earnings.

Filing text · FY2026 10-Q · filed Jul 31, 2026

The Company's effective tax rate for the third quarter of [added] 2026 was higher compared to the third quarter of [added] 2025 primarily due to a higher effective tax rate on foreign earnings, partially offset by the impact of changes in unrecognized tax [added] benefits and tax benefits from share-based compensation. The Company's effective tax rate for the first nine months of [added] 2026 was higher compared to the same period in [added] 2025 primarily due to a higher effective tax rate on foreign earnings, including the impact of changes in unrecognized tax benefits, [added] the impact of foreign currency loss regulations issued by the U.S. Department of the Treasury in December 2024, and the tax impact from foreign currency revaluations in the first quarter of 2025 related to the State Aid Decision.

Cite this change

"The Company's effective tax rate for the first nine months of 2026 was higher compared to the same period in 2025 primarily due to a higher effective tax rate on foreign earnings, including the impact of changes in unrecognized tax benefits, the impact of foreign currency loss regulations issued by the U.S. Department of the Treasury in December 2024, and the tax impact from foreign currency revaluations in the first quarter of 2025 related to the State Aid Decision."

Apple, Form 10-Q for FY2026, Part I, Item 2, accession 0000320193-26-000020, filed 31 July 2026.

Filing: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/320193/000032019326000020/aapl-20260627.htm

Comparison: https://yearover.com/reports/aapl/0000320193-26-000020?ref=quote

Summaries are written by a model and checked against the quoted text. The quotes are the record.

05ChangedPart I, Item 2 › Segment Operating Performance

Summary · quote-checked

Greater China sales shifted from mixed quarterly and nine-month results to increases in both periods, with changed product and currency drivers.

The nine-month direction changed from decreased to increased, Mac’s contribution was replaced by iPhone, and a favorable renminbi effect was added.

Why the model ranked it here

Greater China sales changed from a mixed performance to increases across both reported periods, materially reversing the regional growth narrative.

Filing text · FY2025 10-Q · filed Aug 1, 2025

Greater China net sales increased during the third quarter [removed] of 2025 compared to the [removed] third quarter of 2024 due primarily to higher net sales of [removed] iPhone and Mac. Greater China net sales decreased during the first nine months of 2025 compared to the same period in 2024 due to lower net sales [removed] of iPhone, partially offset by higher net sales of Mac.

Filing text · FY2026 10-Q · filed Jul 31, 2026

Greater China net sales increased during the third quarter [added] and first nine months of 2026 compared to the [added] same periods in 2025 primarily due to higher net sales of [added] iPhone. The strength in the renminbi relative to the U.S. dollar had a favorable year-over-year impact on Greater China net sales [added] during the third quarter and first nine months of 2026.

Cite this change

"Greater China net sales increased during the third quarter and first nine months of 2026 compared to the same periods in 2025 primarily due to higher net sales of iPhone. The strength in the renminbi relative to the U.S. dollar had a favorable year-over-year impact on Greater China net sales during the third quarter and first nine months of 2026."

Apple, Form 10-Q for FY2026, Part I, Item 2, accession 0000320193-26-000020, filed 31 July 2026.

Filing: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/320193/000032019326000020/aapl-20260627.htm

Comparison: https://yearover.com/reports/aapl/0000320193-26-000020?ref=quote

Summaries are written by a model and checked against the quoted text. The quotes are the record.

Show all 23 in Part I, Item 2 (18 more, in filing order)

What the company reported as changed this quarter

Apple reported changes to its risk factors for the quarter ended June 27, 2026 rather than restating the section. This is that text, as filed.

Part II, Item 1A · Risk Factors · Filing text, shown in full. No summary, no comparison.

The Company's business, reputation, results of operations, financial condition and stock price can be materially and adversely affected by a number of factors, whether currently known or unknown, including those described in Part I, Item 1A of the 2025 Form 10-K and Part II, Item 1A of the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 28, 2026 (the "second quarter 2026 Form 10-Q"), in each case under the heading "Risk Factors." Except for the risk factors set forth below and those disclosed in Part II, Item 1A of the second quarter 2026 Form 10-Q, which are incorporated by reference herein, there have been no material changes to the Company's risk factors since the 2025 Form 10-K.

Future operating results depend upon the Company's ability to obtain components and computing resources in sufficient quantities and on commercially reasonable terms.

The Company currently obtains certain components from single or limited sources, which exposes it to significant supply and pricing risks. In addition, many components, including those that are available from multiple sources, are at times subject to industry-wide shortages and significant commodity pricing fluctuations that can materially adversely affect the Company's business, results of operations, financial condition and stock price. For example, the Company is experiencing a period of supply constraints and increasing costs for components driven by factors such as industry supply-demand imbalances for components, including advanced semiconductors, storage (NAND) and memory (DRAM), which adversely affects the Company's ability to obtain sufficient quantities of components and products on commercially reasonable terms, or at all. The Company expects these trends to intensify, which may materially adversely impact the Company's revenue, costs, gross margin, results of operations and financial condition. Actions, such as price increases, that have been and may in the future be taken by the Company may not effectively mitigate these negative impacts, and may also reduce demand for the Company's products and materially adversely affect the Company's revenue, costs, gross margin, results of operations and financial condition.

Future operating results depend upon the Company's ability to obtain components and computing resources in sufficient quantities and on commercially reasonable terms.

Additionally, the Company's new products often utilize custom components available from only one source. When a component or product uses new technologies, initial capacity constraints may exist until the suppliers' yields have matured or their manufacturing capacities have increased. The Company may not be able to extend or renew agreements for the supply of components on similar terms, or at all, and may not be successful in obtaining sufficient quantities from its suppliers in a timely manner, or in identifying and obtaining sufficient quantities from an alternative source. In addition, component suppliers may fail, be subject to consolidation within a particular industry, or decide to concentrate on the production of common components instead of components customized to meet the Company's requirements, further limiting the Company's ability to obtain sufficient quantities of components on commercially reasonable terms, or at all.

Future operating results depend upon the Company's ability to obtain components and computing resources in sufficient quantities and on commercially reasonable terms.

The Company's business, including its artificial intelligence and machine learning offerings, also depends on access to sufficient computing resources. Demand for cloud computing and artificial intelligence infrastructure has increased substantially across the technology industry, resulting in constrained supply, extended lead times, and increasing costs. In addition to its own data center infrastructure, the Company relies on third-party cloud service providers to meet these compute needs, and the Company may be unable to secure sufficient capacity on commercially reasonable terms, or at all, to meet customer demand. If the Company is unable to obtain adequate compute capacity in a timely manner or at commercially reasonable rates, this can limit the functionality and availability of its products and services, delay the deployment of new features or offerings, or cause the Company to incur significantly higher costs to operate its business, any of which could materially adversely affect the Company's revenue, costs, gross margin, results of operations, and financial condition. In addition, the Company may over- or under-estimate requirements, either of which could result in higher-than-expected costs for the Company or an inability to fully satisfy customer demand. Therefore, the Company remains subject to significant risks of supply shortages and price increases that can materially adversely affect its business, results of operations, financial condition and stock price.

The Company's future performance depends in part on support from third-party software developers.

The Company believes decisions by customers to purchase its hardware products depend in part on the availability of third-party software applications and services. Third-party developers may discontinue the development and maintenance of software applications and services for the Company's products. If third-party software applications and services cease to be developed and maintained for the Company's products, customers may choose not to buy the Company's products, materially adversely impacting the Company's business, results of operations, financial condition and stock price.

The Company's future performance depends in part on support from third-party software developers.

The Company believes that third-party developer support depends on the perceived benefits of creating software and services for the Company's products compared to competitors' platforms, such as Android for smartphones and tablets, Windows for personal computers and tablets, and PlayStation, Nintendo and Xbox for gaming platforms. This analysis may be based on factors such as the market position of the Company and its products, the anticipated revenue that may be generated, expected future growth of product sales, and the costs of developing such applications and services.

The Company's future performance depends in part on support from third-party software developers.

The Company's minority market share in the global smartphone, personal computer, tablet and wearables markets can make developers less inclined to develop or upgrade software for the Company's products and more inclined to devote their resources to developing and upgrading software for competitors' products with larger market share. When developers focus their efforts on these competing platforms, the availability and quality of applications for the Company's devices can suffer.

The Company's future performance depends in part on support from third-party software developers.

The Company relies on the continued availability and development of compelling and innovative software applications for its products. The Company's products and operating systems are subject to rapid technological change, and when third-party developers are unable to or choose not to keep up with this pace of change, their applications can fail to take advantage of these changes to deliver improved customer experiences, can operate incorrectly, and can result in dissatisfied customers and lower customer demand for the Company's products.

The Company's future performance depends in part on support from third-party software developers.

The Company distributes third-party applications through the App Store. Where applicable, the Company may retain a commission from sales of applications and sales of digital services or goods initiated within an application. If third-party developers use alternative methods of distribution and payment for their apps and digital content, including direct-to-consumer distribution models, the Company may earn a lower commission on such sales, or may not earn a commission at all, which can materially adversely affect the Company's revenue, gross margin, results of operations, financial condition and stock price.

The technology industry, including, in some instances, the Company, is subject to intense media, political and regulatory scrutiny, which exposes the Company to increasing regulation, government investigations, legal actions and penalties.

From time to time, the Company has made changes to its business, including actions taken in response to litigation, competition, market conditions and legal and regulatory requirements. The Company expects to make further business changes in the future. For example, in the U.S., the Company has implemented changes to how developers communicate with consumers within apps on the U.S. storefront of the iOS and iPadOS App Store regarding alternative purchasing mechanisms. The Company is also currently subject to a court order in the U.S. preventing it from imposing any commission or fee on certain purchases that consumers make. The Ninth Circuit Court has instructed the California District Court to further amend or modify its injunction to allow the Company to charge a commission. If the Company is ultimately unsuccessful in defending its commission structure or if similar restrictions are imposed or expanded in other jurisdictions, and as a result the Company's commission is narrowed or eliminated, the Company's business, results of operations, and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected.

The technology industry, including, in some instances, the Company, is subject to intense media, political and regulatory scrutiny, which exposes the Company to increasing regulation, government investigations, legal actions and penalties.

Globally, several jurisdictions have adopted, or may in the future adopt, competition-related laws and regulations imposing wide-ranging obligations on technology companies and significant limitations on businesses, including the Company. For example, the Company has implemented changes to iOS, iPadOS, the App Store and Safari® in the EU as it seeks to comply with the DMA, including new business terms and alternative fee structures for iOS and iPadOS apps, alternative methods of distribution for iOS and iPadOS apps, alternative payment processing for apps across the Company's operating systems, and additional tools and application programming interfaces for developers. In addition, the DMA imposes interoperability obligations on the Company requiring it to make certain of its technologies and features available to third-party products and services for free, which increases security and privacy risks, requires significant engineering resources, and can adversely affect the functionality, competitiveness, and user experience of the Company's products. Interoperability and other requirements have in the past, and may in the future, cause the Company to not launch or maintain products, services and features, such as Siri AI, in certain jurisdictions. Any of these outcomes can have a negative impact on the Company's competitive advantage and materially adversely affect its business, results of operations, financial condition and stock price.

The technology industry, including, in some instances, the Company, is subject to intense media, political and regulatory scrutiny, which exposes the Company to increasing regulation, government investigations, legal actions and penalties.

The Company has also continued to make changes to its DMA compliance plan in response to feedback and engagement with the Commission. Although the Company's DMA compliance plan is intended to address the DMA's obligations, it has been challenged by the Commission and may be challenged further by private litigants. The DMA provides for significant fines and penalties for noncompliance. While the changes introduced by the Company in the EU are intended to reduce new privacy and security risks that the DMA poses to EU users, many risks will remain. Changes to the Company's business in response to the DMA or other laws and regulations in the EU or in other jurisdictions, including the U.S., could materially adversely affect the Company's business, reputation, results of operations, financial condition and stock price.

The technology industry, including, in some instances, the Company, is subject to intense media, political and regulatory scrutiny, which exposes the Company to increasing regulation, government investigations, legal actions and penalties.

The Company is also currently subject to antitrust investigations and litigation in various jurisdictions around the world, which can result in legal proceedings and claims against the Company that could, individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse impact on the Company's business, results of operations, financial condition and stock price. For example, the Company is subject to civil antitrust lawsuits in the U.S. alleging monopolization or attempted monopolization in the markets for "performance smartphones" and "smartphones" generally in violation of U.S. antitrust laws. In addition, the Company is the subject of investigations in Europe and other jurisdictions relating to App Store terms and conditions. If such investigations or litigation are resolved against the Company, the Company can be exposed to significant fines and may be required to make further changes to its business practices, all of which could materially adversely affect the Company's business, reputation, results of operations, financial condition and stock price.

The technology industry, including, in some instances, the Company, is subject to intense media, political and regulatory scrutiny, which exposes the Company to increasing regulation, government investigations, legal actions and penalties.

Further, the Company has commercial relationships with other companies in the technology industry that are or may become subject to investigations and litigation that, if resolved against those other companies, could materially adversely affect the Company's commercial relationships with those business partners and materially adversely affect the Company's business, results of operations, financial condition and stock price. For example, the Company earns revenue from licensing arrangements with Google LLC ("Google") and other companies to offer their search services on the Company's platforms and applications, and certain of these arrangements are currently subject to government investigations and legal proceedings. On August 5, 2024, Google was found to have violated U.S. antitrust laws. In connection with this finding, on September 2, 2025, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia ("D.C. District Court") ordered certain remedies. The court's order is subject to further proceedings before the D.C. District Court, which may result in changes to the interpretation or application of the remedies ordered by the court, as well as new or changed remedies being ordered. The court's order was appealed by both the DOJ and Google. A reversal of the order on appeal could result in imposition of certain remedies initially proposed by the DOJ, such as those prohibiting Google from offering the Company commercial terms for search distribution. If implemented, these remedies could materially adversely affect the Company's ability to earn revenue from such licensing arrangements.

The technology industry, including, in some instances, the Company, is subject to intense media, political and regulatory scrutiny, which exposes the Company to increasing regulation, government investigations, legal actions and penalties.

The Company's business, results of operations, financial condition and stock price can be materially adversely affected, individually or in the aggregate, by the outcomes of such investigations, litigation or changes to laws and regulations in the future. Changes to the Company's business practices to comply with new laws and regulations or in connection with legal proceedings can negatively impact the reputation of the Company's products for privacy and security. Such changes in business practices can also otherwise adversely affect the experience for users of the Company's products and services, and result in harm to the Company's reputation, loss of competitive advantage, poor market acceptance, reduced demand for products and services, lost sales, and lower profit margins.

The Company's business is subject to a variety of U.S. and international laws, rules, policies and other obligations regarding the collection, use, protection and transfer of personal data.

The Company is subject to an increasing number of federal, state and international laws relating to the collection, use, retention, protection and transfer of various types of personal data. In many cases, these laws apply not only to third-party transactions, but also restrict transfers of personal data among the Company and its international subsidiaries. Several jurisdictions have passed laws in this area, and additional jurisdictions are considering imposing additional restrictions or have laws that are pending. For example, China has regulatory requirements relating to data processing and localization that govern the Company's ability to collect, use, and transfer data in China, and could limit the Company's ability to transfer data outside of China. These laws continue to develop and may be inconsistent from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. Complying with emerging and changing requirements causes the Company to incur substantial costs and has required and may in the future require the Company to change its business practices, including changes to the design of the Company's products and services and limiting the Company's ability to offer a product, service or feature to customers. Such changes in business practices can also otherwise adversely affect the experience for users of the Company's products and services, and result in harm to the Company's reputation, loss of competitive advantage, poor market acceptance, reduced demand for products and services, lower revenue, and lower profit margins. Noncompliance could result in suspension or revocation of business licenses, significant penalties and legal liability.

The Company's business is subject to a variety of U.S. and international laws, rules, policies and other obligations regarding the collection, use, protection and transfer of personal data.

The Company makes statements about its use and disclosure of personal data through its privacy policy, information provided on its website, press statements and other privacy notices provided to customers. Any failure or perceived failure by the Company to comply with these public statements or with federal, state or international privacy or data protection laws and regulations could result in inquiries, proceedings and penalties from governmental entities or others. Such a failure or perceived failure could also result in reputational impacts, ongoing audit requirements and significant legal liability. The risks of inadvertent disclosure of personal data can increase with the introduction of new and complex technologies, such as artificial intelligence features, further exacerbating such risks.

The Company's business is subject to a variety of U.S. and international laws, rules, policies and other obligations regarding the collection, use, protection and transfer of personal data.

In addition to the risks generally relating to the collection, use, retention, protection and transfer of personal data, the Company is also subject to specific obligations relating to the collection and processing of data associated with minors, as well as information considered sensitive under applicable laws, such as health, biometric, financial and payment card data. Health, biometric, financial and payment card data are subject to additional privacy, security and breach notification requirements, and the Company is subject to audit by governmental authorities regarding the Company's compliance with these obligations. If the Company fails to adequately comply with these rules and requirements, the Company can be subject to litigation or government investigations, can be liable for associated investigatory expenses, and can incur significant fees or fines.

The Company's business is subject to a variety of U.S. and international laws, rules, policies and other obligations regarding the collection, use, protection and transfer of personal data.

The Company is also subject to new and changing laws, regulations and other legal obligations regarding online safety, including enhanced protections for minors and mandatory age verification requirements. These obligations can increase regulatory risks by requiring complex compliance measures and significant modifications to the Company's products, services and operations, and may lead to operational disruptions, heightened privacy and data security risks, and increased costs, all of which can have a material adverse impact on the Company's business, results of operations, financial condition and stock price. Failure to comply with such changing laws, regulations and other legal obligations can also result in significant penalties and fines, and legal liability.

Get this when AAPL files next

One email a week with what changed in the filings we cover, in the company's own words. The next report on this company will be in it. You confirm by email first; nothing is sent until you do.

We store your email address. Nothing else. Privacy.